Tagged: oia Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • joly 3:20 am on 11/29/2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , oia, teletruth   

    TELETRUTH OPEN BOARD MEETING – Wed 12/1 #nyc #broadband #Internet #structsep 

    TeleTruthTeletruth Open Board Meeting: The Future of US Broadband, Internet, Telecommunications, Wireless, Cable Services and Competition.

    **NOTE – VENUE HAS CHANGED**

    TELETRUTH OPEN BOARD MEETING
    DECEMBER 1st, 2010, 7:15PM
    Warren Weaver Hall  Rm 517
    251 Mercer St NYC (& West  4th  St)
    Info: bruce@teletruth.org

    CAN’T MAKE THE MEETING or WANT MORE INFO, Click here:
    http://www.teletruth.org/boardmeeting.htm or read on..
    (More …)

     
  • joly 3:11 am on 12/09/2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , bell, broadbnad, , , , , , oia,   

    New Networks addendum to CITI Report on Broadband Deployment 

    FREE REPORT:
    The History, Financial Commitments and Outcomes of Fiber Optic Broadband
    Deployment in America: 1990-2004

    The Wiring of Homes, Businesses, Schools, Libraries, Hospitals and
    Government Agencies

    READ THE REPORT: http://www.newnetworks.com/FCCCITIbroadband.pdf

    The FCC tasked the Columbia Institute for Tele-Information (CITI) to do “an
    analysis of the public statements of companies as to their future plans to
    deploy and upgrade broadband networks as well as an historical evaluation of
    the relationship between previous such announcements and actual deployment”.
    The FCC adds that the focus is on data analysis of “investment plans and
    deployment figures of upgraded broadband infrastructure in this century.”

    CITI’s historical evaluation only goes back to 2004. After talking to CITI
    we decided to create a separate report to cover fiber optic promises for
    the period of 1990-2004 because, in many states, the changes in state laws
    are still on the books for deployments and there have been current rate
    increases based on the previous fiber optic based-broadband deregulation.

    It is clear that billions of dollars have already been collected in most
    states for broadband upgrades of the Public Switched Telephone Networks, the
    utilities. If it didn’t go into the ground in the form of fiber, where did
    it all go?

    Besides the raising of local rates now being diverted to other lines of
    business, from FIOS and U-Verse to even wireless, there are the various
    taxes and surcharges, including the state and federal Universal Service
    funding or state based funds, such as the California Advanced Services Fund.

    None of these funds have been examined as a group, much less in specifics.
    If customers are still paying through local rates and tax perks to upgrade
    the essential facilities, shouldn’t the FCC be investigating ALL funding
    sources and then determining whether the issues, such as cross-subsidization
    of the ‘interstate information products’ or giving USF funding to companies
    who do not ‘need’ the money to be profitable, be examined before the FCC
    determines it needs to raise the Universal Service fund or give other
    financial incentives to pay for broadband?

    The FCC claims it wants a data-driven policy. We supplied the data — It’s
    now the FCC’s turn.

    Report filed with the FCC: Docket Nos. 09-47, 09-51, 09-137
    Contact: Bruce Kushnick, bruce@newnetworks.com
    http://www.newnetworks.com

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: