Difference between revisions of "ICANN ALC"
m |
(→Arguments: Danny embedded!!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
'''Proposed membership in At-Large Constituency (ALC) of ICANN''' | '''Proposed membership in At-Large Constituency (ALC) of ICANN''' | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
==Arguments== | ==Arguments== | ||
| − | Danny Younger's argument against membership of the ALC at the Feb 15, 2007 AGM can be | + | Danny Younger's argument against membership of the ALC at the Feb 15, 2007 AGM: |
| + | <googlevideo>4917641518036309218</googlevideo><br> | ||
| + | It can be downloaded [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4917641518036309218 here]. | ||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
Revision as of 23:04, 19 February 2007
Proposed membership in At-Large Constituency (ALC) of ICANN
Luc Flaubert, of ISOC-Quebec recently posted an invitation for ISOC chapters to become members of the At-large constituency (ALC) of ICANN. We are already members of the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC).
Issues
Is there any conflict in being members of both constituencies?
Would it make us more or less effective in terms of influence? We haven't done much with ICANN so far as an organization, but we should try to in the future -- it's an essential part of the discussion of Internet governance issues.
The ALC has not been very influential in the past in affecting ICANN policies.
Arguments
Danny Younger's argument against membership of the ALC at the Feb 15, 2007 AGM:
It can be downloaded here.
