Difference between revisions of "ICANN ALC"
m (→Audio Recording) |
(added Luc's original invite) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| − | Luc | + | Luc Faubert, of ISOC-Quebec recently posted an invitation for ISOC chapters to become members of the At-large constituency (ALC) of ICANN. We are already members of the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC). |
| + | == Luc's invitation== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <blockquote>From: Luc Faubert <br> | ||
| + | Date: Feb 3, 2007 2:45 AM<br> | ||
| + | Subject: ALS certification with ICANN<br> | ||
| + | </blockquote><blockquote> | ||
| + | Hello fellow ISOC chapter leaders, | ||
| + | </blockquote><blockquote> | ||
| + | We are currently trying to get better representation of the North American | ||
| + | At-Large community within ICANN. Many ISOC Chapters are already certified | ||
| + | At-Large Structures (ALS). Would you consider applying? The application is | ||
| + | quite simple. Certification usually takes a few weeks. | ||
| + | </blockquote><blockquote> | ||
| + | The idea is to have more groups on board as we structure the North American | ||
| + | Regional At-Large Organization to bring together the region's groups, | ||
| + | nominate our reps to the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and have our | ||
| + | voice heard within ICANN. | ||
| + | </blockquote><blockquote> | ||
| + | See http://alac.icann.org/correspondence/structures-app.htm for more info | ||
| + | and a link to the application form. | ||
| + | See http://alac.icann.org/applications/ for a list of certified ALSes. | ||
| + | </blockquote><blockquote> | ||
| + | I would appreciate hearing from you on this. | ||
| + | </blockquote><blockquote> | ||
| + | Regards, | ||
| + | </blockquote><blockquote> | ||
| + | - Luc Faubert <br> | ||
| + | President <br> | ||
| + | ISOC Québec <br></blockquote> | ||
== Issues == | == Issues == | ||
| Line 19: | Line 48: | ||
It can be downloaded [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4917641518036309218 here]. | It can be downloaded [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4917641518036309218 here]. | ||
| − | ===Response from Luc | + | ===Response from Luc Faubert - Feb 18, 2007=== |
Thanks for this, Joly and Danny. | Thanks for this, Joly and Danny. | ||
Revision as of 17:20, 20 March 2007
Proposed membership in At-Large Constituency (ALC) of ICANN
Luc Faubert, of ISOC-Quebec recently posted an invitation for ISOC chapters to become members of the At-large constituency (ALC) of ICANN. We are already members of the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC).
Contents
Luc's invitation
From: Luc Faubert
Date: Feb 3, 2007 2:45 AM
Subject: ALS certification with ICANN
Hello fellow ISOC chapter leaders,
We are currently trying to get better representation of the North American At-Large community within ICANN. Many ISOC Chapters are already certified At-Large Structures (ALS). Would you consider applying? The application is quite simple. Certification usually takes a few weeks.
The idea is to have more groups on board as we structure the North American Regional At-Large Organization to bring together the region's groups, nominate our reps to the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and have our voice heard within ICANN.
See http://alac.icann.org/correspondence/structures-app.htm for more info and a link to the application form. See http://alac.icann.org/applications/ for a list of certified ALSes.
I would appreciate hearing from you on this.
Regards,
- Luc Faubert
ISOC Québec
President
Issues
Is there any conflict in being members of both constituencies?
Would it make us more or less effective in terms of influence? We haven't done much with ICANN so far as an organization, but we should try to in the future -- it's an essential part of the discussion of Internet governance issues.
Arguments
Danny Younger's argument against membership of the ALC at the Feb 15, 2007 AGM
It can be downloaded here.
Response from Luc Faubert - Feb 18, 2007
Thanks for this, Joly and Danny.
ISOC Québec will consider joining NCUC so we can participate in both the At-Large and NCUC.
Regarding participation in At-Large, from our perspective, if we are going to try to convince the ICANN board to reinstate board representation of the user community, we have better chances of accomplishing this by already being part of At-Large.
Having said this, I want to say that I understand and respect Danny's position.
_________________________________________
Luc Faubert
http://www.isoc.qc.ca
Veni Markovski's response pro membership of the ALC at the March 15, 2007 isoc-ny meeting.
Veni Markovski argued that ICANN needed constructive input from the Internet community, and that lack of input rather than an intentionally antidemocratic stance on the part of ICANN leadership, was the real problem. He suggested that, as of now, the ALC represented the most effective method of such input. Danny Younger is trying to maintain old schemes that while perhaps nominally more democratic in structure, failed to be effective in practice, and were thus discarded. Participation, and wider participation, are what counts and the ALC, particularly via the influence of Roberto Gaetano, is the best current avenue for that.
Audio Recording
- Click here to play the whole thing.
- Are we able to be members of NCUC and ALC simultaneously? mp3
- Statement - Participation is Key. mp3
- But why ALC? mp3
- How do ALC and NCUC influence ICANN? mp3
- How is the ICANN board nominated/elected? mp3
- Is ICANN the government of the Internet? mp3
- What are ISOC-NY's options? mp3
- Why the ALC over the NCUC? mp3
- What are the major issues facing ICANN? mp3
- ( Bulgarian vs USA ISP discussion) mp3
- ( broader participation) mp3
- Are there issues specific to ALC? mp3
- Are there advantages in being members of both ALC and NCUC? mp3
